New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

`name` has bad equivalence and definition #105

Open

VladimirAlexiev opened this issue Mar 26, 2024 · 0 comments

Labels

Contributor

VladimirAlexiev commented Mar 26, 2024

aec3po/src/model.ttl

Lines 27 to 33 in bc69db7

    
           aec3po:name a owl:DatatypeProperty ; 
        
            rdfs:label "name"@en ; 
        
            rdfs:comment "The name or the identifier of the BIM model."@en ; 
        
            rdfs:domain schema:Model ; 
        
            rdfs:range xsd:string ; 
        
            owl:inverseOf schema:subjectOf ; 
        
            owl:equivalentProperty schema:about .

schema:about is an object property pointing from a creative work to its subject. (The subject could also be a string if a thing is not available, but is typically a thing).
So how can the name of something be equivalent to its Aboutness? If you have a BIM model, can you even discuss what is it about?
is it really prudent to define a prop as "name or identifier"?

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

VladimirAlexiev added bug ontology labels

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment