Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Questioning the requirements for having CategoryCheckStatement #56

Open
maximelefrancois86 opened this issue Sep 7, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Questioning the requirements for having CategoryCheckStatement #56

maximelefrancois86 opened this issue Sep 7, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
@AmnaKRDB
Labels
discussion conceptual question or idea ontology

Comments

@maximelefrancois86
Copy link
Contributor

The modeling shall depend on what we actually need to tag in the regulation documents.

is it useful to tag the expression of a category of some sort ?

Would a Requirement / Application / Selection / Exception tagged subdivision simply additionally be typed "category", and that's it ?
do we need to tag a larger subdivision of the text, and then link to the category and the things that have/shall have / shall not have ... this category ?
@VladimirAlexiev
Copy link
Contributor

hi @maximelefrancois86 Is this still relevant? Is it a "bug" or you're happy to leave it as is?

@VladimirAlexiev VladimirAlexiev added ontology discussion conceptual question or idea labels Dec 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@AmnaKRDB AmnaKRDB

Labels
discussion conceptual question or idea ontology
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@VladimirAlexiev @AmnaKRDB @maximelefrancois86