Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support logical equivalence rules #15

Open
connorjayr opened this issue Aug 18, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Support logical equivalence rules #15

connorjayr opened this issue Aug 18, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@connorjayr
Copy link
Collaborator

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The logic engine currently has no way to re-express a statement in terms of equivalent statements; this can only be done through decomposition. While the truth tree method is complete, there is no way of directly applying traditional equivalence rules to statements.

Describe the solution you'd like
The user should be able to use equivalence rules as a step in a truth tree. The equivalence rule need not be performed in every child branch, and is not necessary for a statement to be considered fully decomposed.

Describe alternatives you've considered
The alternative requires that a user fully decompose the statement into atomic components, which can become tedious for large statements that can be quickly simplified using logical equivalences.

Additional context
There is no additional context.

@connorjayr connorjayr added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant