Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New release #16

Open
diatomsRcool opened this issue Mar 8, 2021 · 18 comments
Open

New release #16

diatomsRcool opened this issue Mar 8, 2021 · 18 comments

Comments

@diatomsRcool
Copy link
Collaborator

The new term for maternal route is not usable until there is a new ExO release that OBO Foundry can pick up.

@matentzn
Copy link
Collaborator

Related to OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io#1446

@matentzn
Copy link
Collaborator

(exo is still broken because the berkeley release system does not work)

@cjgrondin
Copy link
Contributor

Do you have any further details about how we can fix this? Is this problem widespread?

@matentzn
Copy link
Collaborator

Basically what you need to do is set up a release SOP! you could set up and https://github.com/INCATools/ontology-development-kit based repo, but also, more simply, you could have an SOP where one of your engineers simply runs a ROBOT command (ideally something like this) to generate an OWL release.. once you have that and you commit those files (exo.obo and exo.owl) to the top level of this repo, we can change the OBO purls to point here (I can do that for you). But you will have to come up with a process for release first!

@cjgrondin
Copy link
Contributor

I've uploaded an owl-formatted version of ExO, and thought I created a Pull Request to view and discuss, but I'm not seeing it now. I also tried pasting in a new release version of exo.obo and exo.owl below this comment, but file format not supported. Working on Git terminology. Happy to discuss further via a zoom chat/share screen or follow other suggestions.

@matentzn
Copy link
Collaborator

How did you create the OWL formatted version of ExO? With Protege?

@cjgrondin
Copy link
Contributor

My coworker (one of our engineers) used the robot tool to update the exo.obo file of 2/1/21, then used the robot tool to convert the exo.obo file into owl format.

@matentzn
Copy link
Collaborator

OK great. You can upload both files two the top level of the ExO repo with the Add files button:
image

src/ontology/exo.obo is now your edit file (the place you edit exo)

exo.owl
exo.obo

on the top level of the repo are the release files.

@cjgrondin
Copy link
Contributor

Ok, I uploaded the two files using the Add file button and used the option to create a new branch to propose changes (didn't want to commit directly just in case additional steps were needed)

@cjgrondin
Copy link
Contributor

cjgrondin commented Mar 12, 2021

Compare & Pull Request next?

@matentzn
Copy link
Collaborator

You can commit directly - you are not actually overwriting anything that previously existed!

@cjgrondin
Copy link
Contributor

How do I get back to that option (to commit directly)?

@matentzn
Copy link
Collaborator

Go here:

master...cjgrondin-patch-1

and create a pull request and just merge it..

@cjgrondin
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like it merged successfully. Thanks for your help!

@matentzn
Copy link
Collaborator

@cjgrondin no problem! Can you also rename exo 1.obo to exo.obo?

@matentzn
Copy link
Collaborator

or just merge this: #18

matentzn added a commit to OBOFoundry/purl.obolibrary.org that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2021
@matentzn
Copy link
Collaborator

Ok fixed the purls as well:
OBOFoundry/purl.obolibrary.org#744

@cjgrondin FYI

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants