Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Issues in LineScanner::line_scan_rate #208

Open
SgStapleton opened this issue Jul 15, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Issues in LineScanner::line_scan_rate #208

SgStapleton opened this issue Jul 15, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@SgStapleton
Copy link
Contributor

SgStapleton commented Jul 15, 2019 •
edited
Loading

In LineScanner::line_scan_rate, start_line is specified as "0.5", but this is an ISIS value. I believe USGSCSM is expecting a "0.0"...?
@SgStapleton SgStapleton changed the title Start line value wrong in LineScanner class Issues in LineScanner::line_scan_rate Jul 15, 2019
@SgStapleton SgStapleton mentioned this issue Jul 15, 2019
Closed
@SgStapleton
Copy link
Contributor Author

As per @jessemapel , this needs to be fixed in USGSCSM first.

DOI-USGS/usgscsm#239

@thareUSGS
Copy link
Contributor

For a related topic, in looking into a 3 month-old working ISD for CTX and new non-working ALE version.

  • line_scan_rate first and 3rd parameter are different. 3rd parameter down to 0.5 from 1.0
  • number of quaternions and positions is about double in old version.
  • starting_detector_sample in new is 0 in old it is 1. (but starting_detector_line are both 1)
  • dt_ephemeris and dt_quaternion are different enough to be worrisome

@thareUSGS
Copy link
Contributor

thareUSGS commented Jul 16, 2019 •
edited
Loading

log file for the new ISD in GXP:
log_J03_045994_1986_XN_18N282W.json_newISD.txt.gz

renamed to txt to upload
J03_045994_1986_XN_18N282W_new_sorted.json.txt
J03_045994_1986_XN_18N282W_sorted.json.txt

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@thareUSGS @SgStapleton