Reload of Client Viz always random, never from graph.json

[jpfreeley]

I have successfully generated a graph.json file.

Manual inspection of the graph.json file seems to have proper IPs and edges for my network, however the client doesn't seem to use the data from graph.json but instead reloads a different, random, graph each time.

Any ideas?

[vlebo]

@jpfreeley i believe i have reverted this commit to fix it. But i used the tool only once so i don't recall correctly
f0e9dd0

[FlorianPfisterer]

Are only the IPs different each time or also the structure (edges)?

[vlebo]

I would need to check if i still have the project somewhere on my laptop. I am OOO this week, unfortunately.

[jpfreeley]

@jpfreeley i believe i have reverted this commit to fix it. But i used the tool only once so i don't recall correctly f0e9dd0

Thanks. The problem is not at generat-graph execution. That I also tweaked and removed the random-ip calls .. the problem is at client display ..

[jpfreeley]

Are only the IPs different each time or also the structure (edges)?

I'm not sure what I did differently .. all seems to be working now.

I wish I could tell you what made it work... I do not know.

There is no difference in my index.* files and your index.* files ..

The only thing I can think is that I that I was playing with vis-network/examples directly yesterday and maybe something reloaded or updated.

[jpfreeley]

Are only the IPs different each time or also the structure (edges)?

I'm not sure what I did differently .. all seems to be working now.

I wish I could tell you what made it work... I do not know.

There is no difference in my index.* files and your index.* files ..

The only thing I can think is that I that I was playing with vis-network/examples directly yesterday and maybe something reloaded or updated.

OK .. I've experienced similar behavior again. This issue does not involve "random ips" but rather this is a cache/refresh problem of fetch('graph.json'). I'm running Firefox.

I solved it with the method propsed here (https://stackoverflow.com/a/59493583) using ?dummy= FYI, No other "cache header" methods worked for me.