-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
change_rpath
differs in behaviour from install_name_tool
when handling duplicates
#436
Comments
Yeah, I think #362 caused the deviation. That The |
To be fair, before #362 there was a different deviation. Edit: No, I think the below is not true. I was misremembering how Note that emulating This is also how
I suppose you could have a special |
This causes a deviation in behaviour from `install_name_tool`, which will happily change an existing rpath to one that already exists. Closes Homebrew#436.
This causes a deviation in behaviour from `install_name_tool`, which will happily change an existing rpath to one that already exists. Closes Homebrew#436.
This causes a deviation in behaviour from `install_name_tool`, which will happily change an existing rpath to one that already exists. Closes Homebrew#436.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. |
This causes a deviation in behaviour from `install_name_tool`, which will happily change an existing rpath to one that already exists. Closes #436. Co-authored-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
Suppose I compile a dylib with a duplicate
RPATH
:(Admittedly, I don't know why one would do this, but
pdnsrec
still does.)change_rpath
handles changing oneRPATH
just fine, but chokes on the second:install_name_tool
chugs along just fine, though:This is slightly related to changes we made in #362 and #366, and I think I realised this shortly after, but this slipped off my radar.
It might be that this is intentional and nothing needs changing here, but I just wanted to bring this up just in case you want
ruby-macho
to behave more lookinstall_name_tool
here.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: