New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

basic-branch Counterexample Analysis::hasCounterexample wrongly returns false sometimes #2

Open

pfg666 opened this issue Jun 23, 2022 · 0 comments

Collaborator

pfg666 commented Jun 23, 2022

It considers trees such as the below not to contain counterexamples when they clearly do.

location: I_push[1[int]] V[]
HYP (initial suffix): PIV: {}
SDT: []-+
[]-TRUE: s1
[]-TRUE: s2
[Leaf-]

SUL (initial suffix): PIV: {}
SDT: []-+
[]-(s1=c1)
| []-TRUE: s2
| [Leaf+]
+-(s1!=c1)
[]-TRUE: s2
[Leaf-]

The way the expression is constructed should be reviewed. In my mind, hasCounterexample is akin to asking whether the two SDT's are not equivalent.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment