thanks for writing! I suggest nuancing comparison to BenchmarkTools

[ahbarnett]

Dear Lilith,
Thanks for writing this, which I discovered today due to a discourse thread. I am really enjoying the speed improvement, and the thoughful interface, pipeline and _ notation.
My one comment is to maybe be a bit less harsh on BenchmarkTools.
I always set
BenchmarkTools.DEFAULT_PARAMETERS.seconds=0.1
which, although it does not run in 0.1 sec, runs in about 1 sec. (I don't know why). It makes BT usable - maybe that could be mentioned?

Could you add something in tutorial about extracting the times from @be ?
I found I can do

s=(@be rand(100) sort(_)).samples
hist([s.time for s in s])

to do own histogram of times.

Great package. Thanks, Alex