Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Difference in the number of parameters in the YOLOv9c model compared to the ultralytics version #161

Open
danielaruizl1 opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Difference in the number of parameters in the YOLOv9c model compared to the ultralytics version #161

danielaruizl1 opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@danielaruizl1
Copy link

danielaruizl1 commented Jan 23, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Issue Description
I noticed that there is a significant discrepancy in the number of parameters between the models in this repository and the ones from Ultralytics. For example, according to the ultralytics version, the v9c model has 25.5M parameters, but the mit version shows nearly double that amount (51M). Could you please clarify why this difference exists?

Image
@danielaruizl1 danielaruizl1 added the question Further information is requested label Jan 23, 2025
@Guruprasadhegde
Copy link

@danielaruizl1 , did you get any more insights on this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Guruprasadhegde @danielaruizl1