You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I also believe that -- given that Pandas has become a core part of the standard Python computational science and data science stack -- that we should consider strong integration with Pandas and GeoPandas as core functionality. This is especially true given that one of the highest priorities we've heard from users and potential users is to improve I/O performance (including data alignment and slicing), and that is one of the main purposes/advantages of using Pandas.
Let's please include at least a lightweight Pandas integration in odm2api. I would suggest that we should have Pandas integration at the core of ODM2 software, and that we already have a confusing number of non-integrated repos. Let's consolidate rather than split, especially for such a fundamental package as Pandas
Jeff:
Utility functions would be nice. Is there ongoing work that's driving this?
I don't really have issues with you moving forward with the ODM2API stuff that you have been working on. The Pandas dataframe idea is good.
Starting a focused issue on this specific functionality, instead of the overly broad issue #164. Will copy over comments on this, later.
Goals
Issues I've encountered, and either solved or not solved yet, including (to be updated):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: