You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The way how an energy distribution system is composed should be describable by bringing some technologies together. Technologies on their role combine artificial objects (in this case energy distribution system's components) or other material entities in a specific way.
Ideas of solution
add 'energy distribution system components' (e.g. cables, etc..) as a sub class of 'artificial object'
add 'electricity distribution system' as sub class 'supply system'/'energy system'
add 'electricity distribution technology' as a 'technology'
make 'electricity distribution system' applying 'electricity distribution technology'
So one can, for example, constraint the specification of a distribution system or describe a distribution system to a model.
Further more one can define some measurable quantities characterising such systems.
Workflow checklist
I discussed the issue with someone else than me before working on a solution
I already read the latest version of the workflow for this repository
Thanks for the proposal @koubaa-hmc. Adding a concept for electricity distribution technology is sensible.
I have some questions to clarify:
add 'electricity distribution system' as sub class 'supply system'/'energy system'
Is your proposed electricity distribution system equivalent to the already existing power systemOEO_00360017A power system is an energy system covering the generation, transportation, distribution and consumption of electrical energy.?
If yes, we should add "electricity distribution system" as alternative label.
If not, how would you differentiate? Could you propose a definition?
add 'energy distribution system components' (e.g. cables, etc..) as a sub class of 'artificial object'
Same as above: is your proposed energy distribution system comüponent equivalent to the existing gird componentOEO_00020006 ?
Even though the OP seems to be no longer active, should we look into this? Make our own choices regarding the new concepts?
Since we have no reason to assume electricity distribution system to be different from power system I believe going with the alternative lable would be a good choice.
The second question is trickier. Energy distribution system component was meant to means something like "cable" or maybe "plug" and I feel like it starts where the energy grid ends. But that may be due to my limited understanding of grid component.
Components of 'energy distribution system'
The way how an energy distribution system is composed should be describable by bringing some technologies together. Technologies on their role combine artificial objects (in this case energy distribution system's components) or other material entities in a specific way.
Ideas of solution
So one can, for example, constraint the specification of a distribution system or describe a distribution system to a model.
Further more one can define some measurable quantities characterising such systems.
Workflow checklist
I am aware that
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: