-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 127
Latency of NCS1 vs. NCS2 #14
Comments
A little improvement of RealSense latency. $ python3 MultiStickSSDwithRealSense_OpenVINO_NCS2.py -mod 0 -numncs 1 As expected, Image resizing (640, 480) -> (300, 300) is very high load. According to feedback of #10 by nunux13, it is suggested that performance can be raised below.
[Note]
|
Thanks again @PINTO0309 . I'm trying this out now. |
OK, gave it a try. So I think the latency was improved, but the framerate suffered, down to 2-3FPS from ~10-12FPS. I'm uploading videos now. And also thanks for the reference. As far as I can tell there seems to be something about how OpenVINO/NCS2 is handing the video feed which is introducing much more latency than on the NCSDK with the NCS1. I'll probably post on the Intel NCS forum (which I haven't posted on yet) to see what folks there and hopefully some Intel staff themselves think about the extra latency using OpenVINO/NCS2. Thanks again! |
So this could be a synchronous/asynchronous observer phenomenon, I'm not sure, and will investigate more. That said, I did want to drop in a comparison here of NCS1 (synchronous) vs. NCS2 (asynchronous):
NCS1 (synchronous): https://photos.app.goo.gl/ejezgpvmMz7U53Qu9
NCS2 (asynchronous): https://photos.app.goo.gl/BExZNpWVaTvLA3wn8
Again, I need to check whether this is just an observational thing of synchronous/asynchronous, but wanted to share these in the meantime in case they give an 'ah-ha' moment. :-)
Thanks again,
Brandon
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: