Replies: 3 comments
-
@Blesh as far as I remember, it stops emitting, but doesn't tear down the Observable, so not quite what you have there. @jhusain am I correct here? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Keeps emitting, doesn't tear down Observable. The forEach method however
continues to work the way subscribe works today.
…On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Matthew Podwysocki ***@***.*** > wrote:
@Blesh <https://github.com/blesh> as far as I remember, it stops
emitting, but doesn't tear down the Observable, so not quite what you have
there. @jhusain <https://github.com/jhusain> am I correct here?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2167 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAcfr_U6HXExbNmlw_FMSOZv9WbWGDcnks5rD5dfgaJpZM4LCATi>
.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I think we're going to have to target this for v7. It's an important change, but it will incur a lot of breakage in the community I think. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
This is coming from the TC39 proposal (cc @jhusain)
Basically, to match the behavior of EventTarget, an error in the handler shouldn't cause the source to stop emitting values. In other words:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions