We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Blank nodes that are generated while parsing RDF/XML look a bit complicated. A simple example:
?- rdf_load('http://www.gemeentegeschiedenis.nl/gemeentenaam/rdfxml/Adorp'). ?- rdf(S, 'http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#asWKT', _). S = '_:http://www.gemeentegeschiedenis.nl/gemeentenaam/rdfxml/Adorp#_:Description1',
This seems to be structured as follows:
'_:' + <SOURCE> + '_:' + <DOCUMENT-SCOPED-ID>
It would be nice if an alternative blank node prefix could be passed as an option, e.g., I would like blank nodes to look as follows:
<BLANK-NODE-PREFIX> + <DOCUMENT-SCOPED-ID>
The default value for <BLANK-NODE-PREFIX> could be '_:' + <SOURCE>.
<BLANK-NODE-PREFIX>
'_:' + <SOURCE>
It would also be nice if the <DOCUMENT-SCOPED-ID> would simply be an integer. I'm not sure what Description adds here.
<DOCUMENT-SCOPED-ID>
Description
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Blank nodes that are generated while parsing RDF/XML look a bit complicated. A simple example:
This seems to be structured as follows:
It would be nice if an alternative blank node prefix could be passed as an option, e.g., I would like blank nodes to look as follows:
The default value for
<BLANK-NODE-PREFIX>
could be'_:' + <SOURCE>
.It would also be nice if the
<DOCUMENT-SCOPED-ID>
would simply be an integer. I'm not sure whatDescription
adds here.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: