We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I'm guessing this keyword has the same functionality in both methods: https://github.com/SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl/blob/master/lib/OrdinaryDiffEqBDF/src/algorithms.jl#L145 https://github.com/SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl/blob/master/lib/OrdinaryDiffEqBDF/src/algorithms.jl#L291 Should this be standardized?
This confuses me even more:
OrdinaryDiffEq.jl/lib/OrdinaryDiffEqBDF/src/algorithms.jl
Lines 223 to 226 in f43bcaf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We should expose it as kappa since we don't permit unicode in public APIs.
kappa
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
I'm guessing this keyword has the same functionality in both methods:
https://github.com/SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl/blob/master/lib/OrdinaryDiffEqBDF/src/algorithms.jl#L145
https://github.com/SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl/blob/master/lib/OrdinaryDiffEqBDF/src/algorithms.jl#L291
Should this be standardized?
This confuses me even more:
OrdinaryDiffEq.jl/lib/OrdinaryDiffEqBDF/src/algorithms.jl
Lines 223 to 226 in f43bcaf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: