You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After merging PR #6718, some private designs had a increase in the displacement in the detailed placement stage. However, the 1-site gaps were avoided even without the disallow 1-site gaps flags, so it's possible that DPL is making unnecessary movements to avoid 1-site gaps.
A possible reason for that is that the placement padding might be considered when avoiding 1-site gaps, which is too pessimistic.
Expected Behavior
The displacement should not increase that much, ideally not changing at all when comparing with previous versions of OpenROAD.
Environment
Secure-CI
To Reproduce
Internal testcase.
Relevant log output
Screenshots
No response
Additional Context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the bug
After merging PR #6718, some private designs had a increase in the displacement in the detailed placement stage. However, the 1-site gaps were avoided even without the disallow 1-site gaps flags, so it's possible that DPL is making unnecessary movements to avoid 1-site gaps.
A possible reason for that is that the placement padding might be considered when avoiding 1-site gaps, which is too pessimistic.
Expected Behavior
The displacement should not increase that much, ideally not changing at all when comparing with previous versions of OpenROAD.
Environment
To Reproduce
Internal testcase.
Relevant log output
Screenshots
No response
Additional Context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: