-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mesh a cylindrical domain #5
Comments
The cylindrical CS we recently implanted is a global coordinate system. We don’t have a development plan that will get us to cylindrical sub-features either within a rectangular CS model or on a different axis from the main cylindrical CS.
From: RinaldoMiorini <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 9:48 AM
To: USArmyResearchLab/ParaPower <[email protected]>
Cc: Subscribed <[email protected]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] [USArmyResearchLab/ParaPower] Mesh a cylindrical domain (#5)
All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.
…________________________________
Hi - I was wondering if there is an automated way to mesh cylindrical sub-features like fillets instead of having to manually calculate the equivalent, stair-stepped mesh. Thanks.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub < Caution-#5?email_source=notifications&email_token=ANSW574XV4GRURYYEH6AXXDQ5CDCXA5CNFSM4KFI2YA2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4IFLU2CQ > , or unsubscribe < Caution-https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANSW573M754NLH6X7CX4KKDQ5CDCXANCNFSM4KFI2YAQ > .
|
Thanks! That forces me to avoid details and keeps the model light so in retrospective it is not bad at all. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi - I was wondering if there is an automated way to mesh cylindrical sub-features like fillets instead of having to manually calculate the equivalent, stair-stepped mesh. Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: