Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reverse Growth for Absorb Overlays #5719

Open
esnevip opened this issue Mar 3, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Reverse Growth for Absorb Overlays #5719

esnevip opened this issue Mar 3, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
⏱ Awaiting Response This ticket hasn't been triaged yet. 🎨 Feature Request This is a request for a new feature, or an expansion of an existing feature.

Comments

@esnevip
Copy link

esnevip commented Mar 3, 2025

I'd like a checkbox to be implemented near the absorb overlay settings that will reverse the growth direction for overlays, so that I may have the overlay display right to left while anchored to the end of the bar, instead of growing beyond it. While I understand I can have it clipped, this defeats the purpose of seeing how much absorb I have over the maximum HP similar to the Blizzard functionality.

Some authors have this implemented with custom code
(https://wago.io/pxZF39CG9)
This is exactly what I'd like to have built-in with a checkbox.

Thankyou for everything you folks do!

Image

@esnevip esnevip added the 🎨 Feature Request This is a request for a new feature, or an expansion of an existing feature. label Mar 3, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ⏱ Awaiting Response This ticket hasn't been triaged yet. label Mar 3, 2025
@Guffin7
Copy link

Guffin7 commented Mar 4, 2025

Not the first one that requested this functionality. IIRC that's exactly the default Blizzard behaviour.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⏱ Awaiting Response This ticket hasn't been triaged yet. 🎨 Feature Request This is a request for a new feature, or an expansion of an existing feature.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants