You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was trying to train the ELMo on an augmented version of the 1 Billion Benchmark corpus. The augmented sentences bring in some extra proper nouns to the corpus. So, I added these extra proper nouns (a few thousand) to the default vocab.
I noticed that the training perplexity went to near 4 (just in one epoch of training).
I noticed that the code uses a sampled softmax, so I increased the "n_negative_samples_batch" by 5x. Still the perplexity remains nearly the same (after 1 epoch).
Isn't that weird? Any explainations?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
your augmented 1 Billion Benchmark is much easier for a language model to learn then the original 1 Billion Benchmark (and therefore perplexity really is much lower)
I was trying to train the ELMo on an augmented version of the 1 Billion Benchmark corpus. The augmented sentences bring in some extra proper nouns to the corpus. So, I added these extra proper nouns (a few thousand) to the default vocab.
I noticed that the training perplexity went to near 4 (just in one epoch of training).
I noticed that the code uses a sampled softmax, so I increased the "n_negative_samples_batch" by 5x. Still the perplexity remains nearly the same (after 1 epoch).
Isn't that weird? Any explainations?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: