Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TransactionEssentials 6.0.0 is broken with Spring Boot 3.4.0 #234

Open
ibmmqmet opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 8 comments
Open

TransactionEssentials 6.0.0 is broken with Spring Boot 3.4.0 #234

ibmmqmet opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 8 comments

Comments

@ibmmqmet
Copy link

ibmmqmet commented Nov 25, 2024

A JMS program that worked with Spring Boot 3.3.6 is broken with 3.4.0 because of it calling a missing method.

Looks to be the same thing that caused snowdrop/narayana-spring-boot#172

APPLICATION FAILED TO START


Description:

An attempt was made to call a method that does not exist. The attempt was made from the following location:

    com.atomikos.spring.AtomikosAutoConfiguration.lambda$transactionManager$0(AtomikosAutoConfiguration.java:84)

The following method did not exist:

    'void org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.transaction.TransactionManagerCustomizers.customize(org.springframework.transaction.PlatformTransaction
Manager)'

The calling method's class, com.atomikos.spring.AtomikosAutoConfiguration, was loaded from the following location:

    jar:file:/home/metaylor/.gradle/caches/modules-2/files-2.1/com.atomikos/transactions-spring-boot3/6.0.0/d469a4ebaa9a86e0e979dfafd82ecd2bb655e255/tra
nsactions-spring-boot3-6.0.0.jar!/com/atomikos/spring/AtomikosAutoConfiguration.class

The called method's class, org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.transaction.TransactionManagerCustomizers, is available from the following locations:

    jar:file:/home/metaylor/.gradle/caches/modules-2/files-2.1/org.springframework.boot/spring-boot-autoconfigure/3.4.0/2cf78b01be25952c96cb8ee60b4b0562
b3a136f2/spring-boot-autoconfigure-3.4.0.jar!/org/springframework/boot/autoconfigure/transaction/TransactionManagerCustomizers.class

The called method's class hierarchy was loaded from the following locations:

    org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.transaction.TransactionManagerCustomizers: file:/home/metaylor/.gradle/caches/modules-2/files-2.1/org.springf
ramework.boot/spring-boot-autoconfigure/3.4.0/2cf78b01be25952c96cb8ee60b4b0562b3a136f2/spring-boot-autoconfigure-3.4.0.jar

@ibmmqmet
Copy link
Author

Changing boot.version in transactions-essentials/public/spring-boot3/pom.xml from 3.0.1 to 3.4.0 and rebuilding from that directory "solves" the problem. But obviously that's not the right thing to do as it forces the version change.

@thijmenketel
Copy link

I guess an update is not likely as the last PR merge was in march :(

@jeffjensen
Copy link

@GuyPardon We're wondering if you can fix this and release soon? This is a blocker to using Atomikos with the latest Boot.

@cedricmillet
Copy link

up !

@jeffjensen
Copy link

This is such a blocker with no reply we moved to Narayana, was very easy and works great.

@GuyPardon
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the update! For blocker issues we offer zoom calls and much more.

@tpjotteri
Copy link

Thanks for the update! For blocker issues we offer zoom calls and much more.

I think a fix would be preferable. Or are we to assume that transactions-essentials is dead?

@stefanzugal
Copy link

I acknowledge that @GuyPardon wants to sell services. At the end of the day, everybody has to pay his bills, so that is fine with me. Hence, I had a look whether buying the commercial version would be an option. However, looking at the prices, this is not a viable option. I am afraid that we will also have to leave transactions-essentials behind in case this cannot be fixed. Not meaning to blame anyone, just wanted to share my thoughts.

See: https://www.atomikos.com/Main/BuyOnline

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants