Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does aioseo_options_internal need to be autoloaded? #3218

Open
gosixl opened this issue Jan 2, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Does aioseo_options_internal need to be autoloaded? #3218

gosixl opened this issue Jan 2, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@gosixl
Copy link

gosixl commented Jan 2, 2024

This is my largest autoloaded option. It doesn't seem like it needs to be loaded on every page? Eats into my object caching limit of 1MB (my aioseo_options_internal is about 159,000 bytes)

Background reading: https://kinsta.com/knowledgebase/wp-options-autoloaded-data/

@arnaudbroes
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @gosixl, we do need that option to be autoloaded since it contains a lot of data we require every request. That being said, it does seem like the record on your site is rather large. We're planning to work on major performance improvements in the next few months so I'll definitely take a look at our options and see if we can trim some of them down.

@arnaudbroes arnaudbroes self-assigned this Jan 2, 2024
@gosixl
Copy link
Author

gosixl commented Jan 2, 2024

Super, thank you @arnaudbroes for the feedback. Think I can survive until then.

@rneo
Copy link

rneo commented Nov 4, 2024

And where is the new version? Because it still slows down, a lot of your plugin
Image

@arnaudbroes
Copy link
Contributor

arnaudbroes commented Nov 7, 2024

@rneo we unfortunately had to deviate and work on something else first, but this is now something we're actively working on. I'll ask my developer if he got a chance yet to clean this up and then I'll report back to you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants