Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Write purpose of the module #82

Open
blond opened this issue Dec 9, 2016 · 5 comments
Open

Write purpose of the module #82

blond opened this issue Dec 9, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@blond
Copy link
Member

blond commented Dec 9, 2016

No description provided.

@qfox
Copy link
Contributor

qfox commented Jan 23, 2017

Is this text enough for readme?

Operating with sets of bem-cells like reading, writing files with sets in different formats, adding one set to another, intersecting few sets, subtracting few sets from another, and so on.

I'm not sure what exactly we should write in docs in this section but I guess we should not keep issues opened without explicit description.

@tadatuta
Copy link
Member

We have a document about decls in BEM] and there's a section called Algebra of declarations. So I think the description should refer to this document and tell about the purpose in general.

Knowledge about bem-cells and other implementation peculiarities should be described bellow.

@qfox
Copy link
Contributor

qfox commented Jan 24, 2017

Peculiarities ;-D So you think we need to write about bem-cell in this module? Prob we can do it in a README of bem-cell.

Cross linkage between bem-cell, bem-decl and bem.info is a good idea for sure.

@Yeti-or
Copy link
Member

Yeti-or commented Jan 24, 2017

Personally I feel that we need to describe how to parse deps.js files here

@qfox
Copy link
Contributor

qfox commented Jan 27, 2017

Personally I feel that we need to describe how to parse deps.js files here

Why not to use @bem/deps?

@qfox qfox added the need info label Feb 1, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants