You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We could improve pash by at the same time calling the compiler and start to execute the original command.
This would give some benefits (if done fast---which seems very hard) for scripts where command execution is so small that it ends even before the compiler finished its invocation.
Below follows a solution schematic from an early prototype:
## Solution Schematic:#### (A) (B) (C) (D) (E)## stdin --- tee --- eager --- seq.sh --- eager --- OUT_SEQ## \ (F)## \--- eager --- PAR_IN#### (1) If compiler fails, or sequential is done executing:## - cat OUT_SEQ > stdout#### (2) If compiler succeeds:## - USR1 to reroute so that it redirects to /dev/null## - PAR_IN redirect to par stdin.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We could improve pash by at the same time calling the compiler and start to execute the original command.
This would give some benefits (if done fast---which seems very hard) for scripts where command execution is so small that it ends even before the compiler finished its invocation.
Below follows a solution schematic from an early prototype:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: