You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We should consider adding utilities for integration testing buildpacks (possibly in a separate library) that possibly uses pack and docker. Example of something like this https://github.com/paketo-buildpacks/occam
Alternatively, we could endorse using occam and update docs to reflect this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Alternatively, we could endorse using occam and update docs to reflect this.
We really should not reinvent occam. Either use it from where it currently lives or approach the occam maintainers if they could see moving into the cnb project.
This hasn't received any positive feedback or interest, and in the interest of house keeping, I'm going to close this and suggest that if folks are looking for a way to do integration testing, then they should take a look at https://github.com/paketo-buildpacks/occam.
Split from #53.
We should consider adding utilities for integration testing buildpacks (possibly in a separate library) that possibly uses pack and docker. Example of something like this https://github.com/paketo-buildpacks/occam
Alternatively, we could endorse using
occam
and update docs to reflect this.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: