Update Paketo's suggested builders #2200
Labels
status/discussion-needed
Issue or PR that requires in-depth discussion.
type/enhancement
Issue that requests a new feature or improvement.
Milestone
Description
Currently the Pack CLI's known builders list contains the following suggested Paketo builders:
pack/internal/builder/known_builder.go
Lines 40 to 67 in ce8db3c
The descriptions for the builders defined in this repo (which are used when offline and Pack CLI can't pull from the registry) currently don't match the descriptions set on the builders themselves:
https://github.com/paketo-buildpacks/builder-jammy-base/blob/a967f70684506e873bc7c8b23a74f46d51d3c526/builder.toml#L1
https://github.com/paketo-buildpacks/builder-jammy-full/blob/406b1cd36df58012e4700050f42e718bda76d572/builder.toml#L1
https://github.com/paketo-buildpacks/builder-jammy-tiny/blob/bf9411eb6aa3ecf208976bf3154d90f536a4bd74/builder.toml#L1
Also, I'm a bit confused why
paketobuildpacks/builder-jammy-buildpackless-static
is a Pack suggested builder, when that builder isn't listed on the Paketro builders page?https://paketo.io/docs/reference/builders-reference/
Lastly, I wonder whether having 4 suggested builders might be slightly too many, given Heroku and Google only have one suggested builder each? I think it does make sense to include the full vs base vs tiny builders, but perhaps the "buildpackless" builder variant shouldn't be a suggested builder? (If only because it's not really suitable for beginners, given it won't work without also specifying external buildpacks.)
Proposed solution
builder.toml
metadatapaketobuildpacks/builder-jammy-buildpackless-static
to being only a trusted builder and not also a suggested builder. (Or if that builder is deprecated, given it's not listed on https://paketo.io/docs/reference/builders-reference/ , then perhaps remove it from known-builders entirely?)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: