Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How is extremely high-coverage defined? #698

Open
bfurtwa opened this issue Mar 7, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

How is extremely high-coverage defined? #698

bfurtwa opened this issue Mar 7, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@bfurtwa
Copy link

bfurtwa commented Mar 7, 2018

On the page http://millstone.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user_guide/intro.html there is the following written:

"Note: Extremely high-coverage samples and short fragments with non-overlapping reads might cause difficulties. Try at your own risk. You might consider downsampling or cleaning the reads first"

I have paired-reads of a bacterial genome with coverage of 300. Is this already extremely high?

@glebkuznetsov
Copy link
Member

Paired-reads with coverage 300 should be fine; in fact, that sounds ideal.

We were referring to cases where users had sequenced plasmids at 5000x coverage.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants