Generic Directive Extension List

Generic Directives is still in active discussion in http://talk.commonmark.org/t/generic-directives-plugins-syntax . But for brainstorming purposes, here is some possible extensions to support, or at least adhere to if not included.

It might look like !extensionName[](){}

---

Below is a list of extensions and it's purpose.

• extensionName :

• Purpose:

• [] : contentField

• () : argumentField

• {} : keyValueField

• **** :

• Purpose:

• [] :

• () :

• {} :

---

• default : default extension

• Purpose: used if no extension name is specified. Reads url, and chooses the appropriate extensions. E.g. .png will be embedded using the image extension

• [] :

• () : Reads the url name to determine filetype

• {} :

• image : embed image

• Purpose: embeds image in page

• [] : image alt text

• () : image url

• {} : width="width of image", height="height of image"

• TOC : Table of contents

• Purpose: Embed a table of content, based on header names.

• [] : Title of TOC, could default to "Table of contents"

• () :

• {} :

This seems forced into the provided syntax. Why is this not a block element? Why is the title provided inside the syntax as opposed to just being text prior to the "TOC" tag?

• spoiler : Hides spoilers

• Purpose: Informs display to hide content, unless user wants to be shown the spoilers

• [] : Spoiler Text

• () :

• {} :

• fig : figure

• Purpose: create a figure instance

• [] : <figname> name of figure

• () :

• {} : type="numeric/letter/figname"

• Block Directive Content : Content of figure

How is this semantically different to a creator than an image and some text? How would it co-exist with existing syntax for images, and code blocks, both of which are mentioned in the spec as uses for the <figure> tag. What would this resolve to in non-HTML implementations? (ie - What "is" a figure?)

• ref : link to figure
• Purpose: link to figure created from 'fig'
• [] :
• () : figname
• {} : type="override numeric/letter/figname"

What is this providing beyond duplicating the link syntax?