Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
76 lines (56 loc) · 3.27 KB

Future-UTC-DateTime.md

File metadata and controls

76 lines (56 loc) · 3.27 KB

Future DateTime UTC timestamps

If you are certain that all of your timestamps are in the past, then you can safely ignore this guide.

If you are working with timestamps that are in the future, and those timestamps are inside countries with governing bodies that have the ability to change timezone rules, including daylight savings, then you may want to consider your timestamp storage strategy. Shortly, it's not foolproof to convert the timestamp to UTC and store only that DateTime.

Rules Change

Consider this scenario: It's currently year 2019 and you receive a timestamp for a user located in Washington, USA for July 4, 2022. You convert it to UTC and store it in your database.

Today (in year 2019), Washington state recognizes Daylight Savings Time and it shifts back and forth an hour over the year. Since the timestamp is in the summer, it's shifted forward an hour.

In 2020, Washington enacts a new law that declares that they will no longer be participate in Daylight Savings Time; meaning it's always shifted back one hour year-round.

You've already stored your timestamps in the future converted to UTC using the old rules. How do you know to fix all your timestamps in your database for users in Washington state?

What is our context?

There are 3 elements at play:

  1. You need a consistent timestamp field for database queries (opposed to strings). Usually this is UTC timestamps.
  2. The user provided a timestamp based on their location, and looked at the clock on their desk when filling in the form in your web app.
  3. The provided timestamp is based on the location the user is in, and that location follows a set of rules of how time changes throughout the year.

We need to store timestamps in a database column made for timestamps so we can achieve #1. This can be more complicated given your database, but using Postgres as an example, it internally converts to UTC and queries against that. If you're using Ecto as your data mapper, it must always be in UTC before storage.

If the law changes between now and the future timestamp, we've lost the correct wall time for the user in #2.

When we immediately convert to UTC, we lose the context in #3.

Storage Strategy

Store the user's provided timestamp and timezone separately from the converted UTC. For example:

field :my_timestamp_utc, :utc_datetime
field :my_timestamp_tz, :string
field :my_timestamp_wall, :naive_datetime

Since we're making my_timestamp_utc a :utc_datetime, we are affirming we have the timezone information of UTC. Since we're making my_timestamp_wall a :naive_datetime, we're affirming we do not have the timezone.

Once you have these 3 pieces of context, you can periodically update and verify changes. It would be good to update your UTC timestamps whenever your tzdata files are updated. If the walltime + timezone is reconverted to UTC and is different from your stored UTC timestamp, then you know the rules have changed since storage. Update the UTC timestamp and perhaps notify the customer to ensure the intentions are still correct (for example, did they already know of the upcoming law change and anticipate it?).

Credits

http://www.creativedeletion.com/2015/03/19/persisting_future_datetimes.html