You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
The elo value used for sorting cards and that displays when you click into a specific card under the card image is very different from the elo reported on the historical elo graph for that card. Many cards that have interesting historical elo data show as 1200 (default) elo on the card's page and others have wildly different values showing in the two locations. This makes it hard to use the elo sorting function effectively.
Expected behavior
I'd expect the sorting value to equal the value under the card's name (as it does) but for those to correspond to the most recent historical value of the elo, which is presumably most accurate
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the bug
The elo value used for sorting cards and that displays when you click into a specific card under the card image is very different from the elo reported on the historical elo graph for that card. Many cards that have interesting historical elo data show as 1200 (default) elo on the card's page and others have wildly different values showing in the two locations. This makes it hard to use the elo sorting function effectively.
To Reproduce
https://cubecobra.com/tool/card/85c60177-8b71-4e24-87e7-395d5e4f93ff?tab=1 look at this card, for example. Its elo on the card page is showing as 904 whereas the most recent elo over time value is 1271
Expected behavior
I'd expect the sorting value to equal the value under the card's name (as it does) but for those to correspond to the most recent historical value of the elo, which is presumably most accurate
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: