Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PERF] Issues missed by auto-filer #108027

Open
DrewScoggins opened this issue Sep 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[PERF] Issues missed by auto-filer #108027

DrewScoggins opened this issue Sep 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
area-Meta tenet-performance Performance related issue tenet-performance-benchmarks Issue from performance benchmark untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner

Comments

@DrewScoggins
Copy link
Member

These issues were missed by the auto-filer during the 9.0 development cycle. Tracking them here, as well as tagging those who seem the most likely to be able to investigate the issue based on the changes in the commit range.

Top level issue Date Notes x64 CoreCLR Win x64 CoreCLR Lin x64 MonoJit Lin Arm64 CoreCLR Lin
#97202 (PR) 26-Jan Was not auto-filed N/A
f36aa7e...ee501fb
15-Mar No autofile N/A
#100160 (PR) 26-Mar Missed by auto-filer N/A
6931b3b...815650e 5-Aug No autofile N/A
16cb414...9a3cacd 26-Jan No autofile N/A
#97488 (PR) 29-Jan No regressions linked but seems to be likely cause of at least 1 Linux Coreclr x64 regression #97488 (PR)
c7d36b4...d5026a1 28-Aug No autofile, unclear cause N/A
#102261 (PR) 30-May No linked regressions, may be cause of at least one on x64LinCore #102261 (PR)
6927fea...d7ae8c6 13-Jun No autofile, one test x64LinCore N/A
#99541 (PR) 12-Mar No regressions linked, but seemingly 1 x64LinCore regression missed #99541 (Missed, Likely PR)
#106578 (PR) 18-Aug No linked regressions and recent so unclear if potential cause #106578 (PR)
#98610 (PR) 19-Feb PR never linked to any regressions, though seems most likely to be cause of an Arm64 Lin CoreCLR regression #98610 (Missed, PR)
e1c6717...0fb0188 7-May N/A (1 Issue, Brotli.Compress_WithoutState: 7.85% reg)
9bb2b5b...60be20c 29-Nov N/A (1 Issue, Perf_Console.ResetConsole: 6.12%)
c422fca...8c02b08 9-Nov N/A (1 Issue, LinqBenchmarks.Order00ManualX: 5.73%)
954ead3...fae6720 13-Feb N/A (1 Issue, Perf_Uri.EscapeDataString: 14.2%)
74f7f91...1bf325c 19-Jun N/A (2 Issues, IPAdressPerformanceTests: Noisy NS)
#100899 (PR) 11-Apr No regressions linked but likely cause of Arm64 lin Core ref handle stabalization to high bi-modal behavior #100899 (PR)
ddf9fee...0d641e5 26-Jan N/A (1 Issue, CtorFromCollectionNonGeneric: 47.94%+)
d752f9a...b29efed 26-Feb No issue - Likely chrome bump (3 cases)
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Sep 19, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Sep 19, 2024
@DrewScoggins DrewScoggins added tenet-performance Performance related issue tenet-performance-benchmarks Issue from performance benchmark labels Sep 19, 2024
@jeffschwMSFT
Copy link
Member

@DrewScoggins what are your thoughts on how to identify who should investigate the 20'ish issues above?

@vcsjones vcsjones removed the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Sep 25, 2024
@DrewScoggins
Copy link
Member Author

Sorry for the delay here. I was going to update the table here to make this a bit more actionable. I will go through and update the table with a link to the regressed test, as well as a best guess of the commit in the range that could be responsible. I will also tag the PR author.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-Meta tenet-performance Performance related issue tenet-performance-benchmarks Issue from performance benchmark untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants