You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@kennyp@kr@hgmnz@ferd@tmaher
Due to quantum computing threats multiple cybersecurity agencies like french ANSSI recommend using AES256 for encryption and atleast SHA384 for hashing purpose. I guess just replacing the algorithms might benefit the entire cryptographic community.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
evil-user
changed the title
Request to replace AES128 with AES256 and SHA256 with SHA384 or SHA512.
Request to replace AES128 with AES256 and SHA256 with SHA384 or SHA512 in fernet.
Jun 25, 2022
Agreed, while 128 bit is technically still within the recommended range of 120bit minimum, it's hanging on by a thread, some already consider it theoretically broken, and if not today, then it will be in the not so distant future.
AES128 should be phased out imo, and AES256 would be a sweet spot in most cases.
Once quantum computers will scale 128 bit will no longer cut it, 256 probably still would tho
Even years ago, we had ended up making a fernet-like library that instead used AES-GCM and called it hairnet. I don't think fernet itself has any active ownership anymore.
@kennyp @kr @hgmnz @ferd @tmaher
Due to quantum computing threats multiple cybersecurity agencies like french ANSSI recommend using AES256 for encryption and atleast SHA384 for hashing purpose. I guess just replacing the algorithms might benefit the entire cryptographic community.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: