-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Optional Flows in LinearConverter #45
Comments
Staring a more generic approach: Making flows optional would make modeling certain things much easier. |
For a nice user experience, it would be nice to have such a possible workflow:
|
Mathematically:Controlling the Number of Active Equations in a LinearConverterModel
Issues with other functionality:
This was tested with a super basic example and worked
Results:
|
In contrary to prior discussions, after some testing, "optional flows" are already possible.
The resulting math would be:
This effectively allows the optimizer to choose between the different thermal outputs. Full Script for testing:
|
Ok, da sollten wir überlegen wie wir diese 2 unterschiedlichen Funktionalitäten zusammenführen können. |
Ich denke auch dass wir die Restriktion ENTWEDER/ODER als Zusatz lassen. |
optional and obligatory flows
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: