You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the modification methods are difficult to use since they may change labels without telling the user what they did. Here is a suggestion to solve that problem:
Instead of returning a surface, we return a homomorphism (either from old -> new or new -> old). Then, we can use the homomorphism to give us the changed labels. This is possible for all simple splitting and joining methods.
If it is necessary to define a general modification method that is not amenable to this description, a different solution would have to be found for it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the modification methods are difficult to use since they may change labels without telling the user what they did. Here is a suggestion to solve that problem:
Instead of returning a surface, we return a homomorphism (either from old -> new or new -> old). Then, we can use the homomorphism to give us the changed labels. This is possible for all simple splitting and joining methods.
If it is necessary to define a general modification method that is not amenable to this description, a different solution would have to be found for it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: