Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GAP does not properly communicate with ACE on table size increase #39

Open
rokicki opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

GAP does not properly communicate with ACE on table size increase #39

rokicki opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@rokicki
Copy link

rokicki commented Jun 18, 2024

LoadPackage("ace");
TCENUM:=ACETCENUM;;
Print("aaaa,aba'b'a'bb");;
f := FreeGroup("a","b");;
g := f / [ f.1*f.1*f.1*f.1,f.1*f.2*f.1^-1*f.2^-1*f.1^-1*f.2*f.2 ];
Size(g);

Observed behaviour

Scrolling message:

#I  Coset table calculation failed -- trying with bigger table limit

forever. From debugging it appears the workspace size and/or table limit is not
actually being increased.

Identical (bad) behavior on Linux and on MacOS.

Expected behaviour

The table limit and/or workspace size should be increased, so the coset enumeration
succeeds. (ACE easily handles the group given in the example above.)

Copy and paste GAP banner (to tell us about your setup)

 ┌───────┐   GAP 4.13.0 of 2024-03-15
 │  GAP  │   https://www.gap-system.org
 └───────┘   Architecture: aarch64-apple-darwin23-default64-kv9
 Configuration:  gmp 6.3.0, GASMAN
 Loading the library and packages ...
 Packages:   AClib 1.3.2, Alnuth 3.2.1, AtlasRep 2.1.8, AutPGrp 1.11, 
             CRISP 1.4.6, Cryst 4.1.27, CrystCat 1.1.10, CTblLib 1.3.9, 
             FactInt 1.6.3, FGA 1.5.0, GAPDoc 1.6.7, IRREDSOL 1.4.4, 
             LAGUNA 3.9.6, Polenta 1.3.10, Polycyclic 2.16, PrimGrp 3.4.4, 
             RadiRoot 2.9, ResClasses 4.7.3, SmallGrp 1.5.3, Sophus 1.27, 
             SpinSym 1.5.2, StandardFF 1.0, TomLib 1.2.11, TransGrp 3.6.5, 
             utils 0.85
@fingolfin
Copy link
Member

For some further details: there was an earlier discussion at gap-system/gap#5749

@gregg0
Copy link
Contributor

gregg0 commented Jun 19, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants