Why the compiled of the new llama-gguf-split is way bigger than the old gguf-split #9536
Answered
by
ggerganov
andibuwono
asked this question in
Q&A
-
Hello all, Just curious, after building the llama.cpp suite. i notice the gguf-split replaced by llama-gguf-split. But as i saw the compiled binary size is way bigger now (from ~ 3MB to ~66MB), as shown below. Is there significant changes that make the binary bigger than it was? Many thanks. ab |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answered by
ggerganov
Sep 19, 2024
Replies: 1 comment 6 replies
-
No changes have been introduced. Probably some sub-optimal build steps. On MacOS the produced binary with |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
6 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I just tested on my Linux box building static binaries with
make
without CUDA or other backends and the resulting static binaries are much larger than the ones that I get on MacOS: