You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I tried to run the pipeline on TUM and Replica dataset but it is much slower than the numbers reported in the paper. The actual speed is less than 0.5 FPS. I tested the pipeline on an RTX 4090, so it should be faster. Is there any settings I need to modify to match the numbers in the paper?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @Poiw ,
Sorry for my late reply. The reason for this traces itself back to MonoGS actually, since we reuse parts of their mapping code. It seems that running the codebase on a cluster machine is much slower than running it on a local device, as long as the local device has enough memory etc. We are still not sure why this is the case.
Thanks for the reply! I run the code on a local machine. The replica sequences are faster which achieves > 1fps, but the TUM sequence (fr1, desk) I tested is less than 0.5 FPS.
Hi,
I tried to run the pipeline on TUM and Replica dataset but it is much slower than the numbers reported in the paper. The actual speed is less than 0.5 FPS. I tested the pipeline on an RTX 4090, so it should be faster. Is there any settings I need to modify to match the numbers in the paper?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: