You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The example is a non-null type wrapping a list type that wraps a non-null type (allowed) rather than a non-null type directly wrapping a non-null type.
The example is a non-null type wrapping a list type that wraps a non-null type (allowed) rather than a non-null type directly wrapping a non-null type.
How would one hypothetically define a non-null type that directly wraps another non-null type, while also being grammatically correct?
The only counter-example I can currently think of is Int!!, but the grammar doesn't allow such a production.
The specification states that:
In the specification we see the type
[Int!]!
used in an example, which is a non-null list type that wraps another non-null named type.The validation rule cannot hold and the example be valid simultaneously.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: