-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
renderers placed in _rendererPool
in VirtualLayout
are not aware of Toolkit.pixelsPerRem
change
#529
Comments
Is there any chance of a test / repro? Id like to understand exactly whats going on. Cheers, |
what does your renderer look like? I'll try and reproduce this end. Cheers, |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<CustomListItemRenderer styleName="lobbyTableListRow" layoutName="horizontal" width="100%" padding="0">
<box id="col1" verticalAlign="center">
<TablesListRowPlayersView id="players" width="100%" />
</box>
<box styleName="divider" height="100%" />
<box id="col2" verticalAlign="center">
<label id="stake" width="100%" horizontalAlign="center" textAlign="center" />
</box>
<box styleName="divider" height="100%" />
<box id="col3" verticalAlign="center">
<TablesListRowGameSpeedView id="gameSpeed" width="100%" />
</box>
<box styleName="divider" height="100%" />
<box id="col4" verticalAlign="center" width="100%">
<label id="tableNumber" width="100%" horizontalAlign="center" textAlign="center" />
</box>
<box id="extraCol" />
</CustomListItemRenderer> class CustomListItemRenderer extends ItemRenderer {
public var isInactive:Bool = false;
public function new() {
super();
autoRegisterInteractiveEvents = false;
addEventListener(openfl.events.MouseEvent.RELEASE_OUTSIDE, _onItemMouseReleasedOutside);
}
override private function _onItemMouseOver(e:MouseEvent) {
if (!e.touchEvent && !isInactive && !hasClass(":hover")) {
addClass(":hover");
}
}
private var mouseDownTimestamp:Float = 0;
override private function _onItemMouseDown(e:MouseEvent) {
mouseDownTimestamp = Timer.stamp();
if (!isInactive && !hasClass(":down")) {
addClass(":down");
}
}
override private function _onItemMouseOut(e:MouseEvent) {
removeClasses([":down", ":hover", ":click"]);
}
override private function _onItemMouseUp(e:MouseEvent) {
if (e.touchEvent) {
var clickEventStamp = Timer.stamp();
if (clickEventStamp - mouseDownTimestamp > 400.millis().toSeconds()) {
// long touches are being filtered
removeClasses([":down", ":hover", ":click"]);
e.cancel();
return;
}
}
if (isInactive) {
removeClasses([":down", ":hover", ":click"]);
e.cancel();
return;
}
removeClasses([":down", ":hover"], false);
addClass(":click");
Timer.delay(() -> removeClass(":click"), 160.millis());
super.onItemClick(e);
}
private function _onItemMouseReleasedOutside(e:Dynamic) {
removeClasses([":down", ":hover", ":click"]);
}
override private function validateComponentData() {
onDataChanged(_data);
}
override private function onPointerEventsMouseOver(e:MouseEvent) {}
override private function onPointerEventsMouseDown(e:MouseEvent) {}
override private function onPointerEventsMouseOut(e:MouseEvent) {}
override private function onPointerEventsMouseUp(e:MouseEvent) {}
}
|
Well, that's pretty logical. Renderers that have been removed from the stage and are in the pool are not invalidated by stage events. Therefore, it is necessary to validate them when they return to the stage. On the other hand, I don't understand why they don't get validated "automatically" (I mean on another layer of abstraction, like in "Component") when they are returned to the stage via |
So, ive had a little look, and i think you are right, i think that when a component is added to another component that child should probably be invalidating itself... i think what happens is the "isReady" flag is true on the child (which is correct) which means it skips a bunch of invalidation stuff. That should probably always invalidate the child. Ive actually noticed something else while playing with this: http://haxeui.org/builder/?32b1ae05 You'll notice that when you hit "Set 1", nothing at all happens, but i would expect that the square doubles in size. So Ill take a look at that... to the original issue, if you change these lines: https://github.com/haxeui/haxeui-core/blob/master/haxe/ui/core/Component.hx#L400-L402 to: if (_componentReady) {
if (!child.isReady) {
child.ready();
} else {
child.invalidateComponent();
}
} Does it fix that issue? Cheers, PS: whats the app, it looks interesting :) |
To scale an application I'd prefer to use
Toolkit.pixelsPerRem
instead ofscaleX
andscaleY
for some reasons. WhenToolkit.pixelsPerRem
value is changed, renderers placed in_rendererPool
inVirtualLayout
are not aware of that change, so when they back on stage they are displayed incorrectly.From my point of view, suggested solution would be adding
instance.invalidateComponent(InvalidationFlags.ALL, true);
call toVirtualLayout.getRenderer
:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: