Remove remote code warning #36285
Open
Remove remote code warning #36285
+1
−6
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
4 tasks
|
cc @ArthurZucker @Cyrilvallez for review! |
Rocketknight1
force-pushed
the
remove_pipeline_warning
branch
from
551db8e to
7121b5f
Compare
|
The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. |
|
This change is also nice for reducing warnings in automated tests |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When
trust_remote_code=Trueis passed to a non-Auto class, the class raises a warning that the argument has no effect, but continues.This warning is getting thrown because some of our pipelines are passing the
trust_remote_codekwarg through to the model. Users can't avoid this becausetrust_remote_codeis required for the pipeline. I can dig into that in future, to make sure unnecessary args aren't going tomodel.from_pretrained()but for now I think we can just remove this warning because it's kind of pointless and our code needs fewer warnings anyway ✨Fixes #36273