You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In order to ensure a decent level of predictability for (or a lack of the need of)
for messages in Wintermute, this issue (until the release of 0.1.0) serves as a
reference point for what a Message object should initially be in JSON. Things that
base themselves upon a Message like MethodCall and the likes will have their
own implementation but will be contained within a message.
Some things pivotal for a message's integrity:
timestamp - The time, in UTC, at which a message was crafted. This doesn't
represent when it was sent though, not sure if that matters.
sender - The information needed to learn about the instance of Wintermute
that sent this Message. Initially, this was equivalent to a JSON object
representing a Module::Designation object but more information might be needed.
receiver - The information needed to learn about the instance of Wintermute
to receive this Message. Initially, this was equivalent to a JSON object
representing a Module::Designation object but more information might be needed.
payload - This would be the actual data being sent to the receiver. This
is expected to be a dictionary, though later implementations might change this.
Proposed Fields
flags - An array of text representing fields that were used to modify the payload value. Something like this would help with encryption, signing and the likes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In order to ensure a decent level of predictability for (or a lack of the need of)
for messages in Wintermute, this issue (until the release of 0.1.0) serves as a
reference point for what a
Message
object should initially be in JSON. Things thatbase themselves upon a
Message
likeMethodCall
and the likes will have theirown implementation but will be contained within a message.
Some things pivotal for a message's integrity:
represent when it was sent though, not sure if that matters.
that sent this Message. Initially, this was equivalent to a JSON object
representing a Module::Designation object but more information might be needed.
to receive this Message. Initially, this was equivalent to a JSON object
representing a Module::Designation object but more information might be needed.
is expected to be a dictionary, though later implementations might change this.
Proposed Fields
payload
value. Something like this would help with encryption, signing and the likes.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: