Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kill the Wiki? #238

Open
rgaudin opened this issue Feb 11, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

Kill the Wiki? #238

rgaudin opened this issue Feb 11, 2025 · 4 comments

Comments

@rgaudin
Copy link
Member

rgaudin commented Feb 11, 2025

The Kiwix Wiki is full of outdated content. When it's not incorrect, it's usually incomplete or present information that is available elsewhere.

The main issue is that there is no warning that the Wiki has been abandoned for years and does not represent a reliable source of information.

It think the very minimum we should do is add a banner informing users that this is mostly obsolete.

Beside this, we should discuss:

  • turning it read-only
  • moving it to an explicit archive URL (we handling of 404 in replacement website so permalink are not complete dead links)
  • maybe create a ZIM of it
  • decide whether a wiki for Kiwix is actually wanted. And maybe setup a lighter one in this case
@Popolechien
Copy link
Member

I can see a mild use of the Wiki for the hackathon, but that's about it. Archiving it or making it read-only would not solve the issue of people finding it and looking up outdated information. If we are to keep it then I would make it private.

@rgaudin
Copy link
Member Author

rgaudin commented Feb 11, 2025

Hence the banner I mentioned first. Not sure what private entails in practice but if no content is available, it will push users towards the indexed/InternetArchive versions which wont have the banner.

@Popolechien
Copy link
Member

Nobody reads banners https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banner_blindness

I don't see user going to the internet archive when there's other, fresh content available elsewhere.

@rgaudin
Copy link
Member Author

rgaudin commented Feb 11, 2025

I don't see user going to the internet archive when there's other, fresh content available elsewhere.

Do you understand the use case I'm writing about? Say User looks for “Kiwix Hotspot” in Google. There's a link to that Wiki page because it was relevant at some point. User clicks but it doesn't work because it's private (credentials prompt?). User would hit Back and use the search engine feature to access the archived version.

I suggested that we keep the URL working and there present information mentioning it's gone.

Whether people read it or not, we have the responsibility to write that content we keep online is outdated ; otherwise we mislead them on purpose.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants