You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Description:
As per requested at Telegram by user Marino, the following review outlines my personal considerations for a UX/UI review with an enfasis on the audience in order to profile the user experience as whats is expected from them and thus shape the design.
Disclaimer: please excuse that i use the "we" becouse i set my self as part of review process, please account that is not my intention to portrait my self as part of the oficial Kleros team wich im not currently a member.
In this review process the following arises to my mind.
Purpose and Audience:
Purpose of the Tool:
Whoˋs the target audience? In the means of... Is it a "demo" for a client or a tool for end-users?
If its meant to be a demo for a client, do we align with thier design style?
if it is a end-user, is the style towards thier preferences?
Current observations: Color Scheme:
Current colors used:
Current colors seems more suited for night use, contrast could improve.
Suggested colors:
If a primary color is already defined by its Purpose and Audience
Are we also considering upcoming trends and and harmonic palettes, ie: Pantone 2025?
User Expectations:
Taking into accound that most users develop mental models based on their experiences with similar tools.
Do we align with these mental models with the ones that preceded? (big if) ie: https://curate.kleros.io
Hyperlinks and Navigation:
-Compared to other tools like https://curate.kleros.io where while at the "Module Details" where "Module History" inconsistency with hyperlinks expectations might arise.
There seems to be entries in the data generated by this module that do not meet the criteria of the original Address Tag registry. Prompting jurors to verify this and reject accordingly.
Submitted - Wed, 14 Aug 2024 08:31:15 GMT by 0xf313...c2f6
Users might expect uniformity across the brand's ecosystem.
Suggestion: Ensure consistent hyperlink usage to meet user expectations.
. Accessibility:
Ensure the design is accessible to all users, including those with disabilities ie: Color blindness CVD and if within reach WCAG adherence .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description:
As per requested at Telegram by user Marino, the following review outlines my personal considerations for a UX/UI review with an enfasis on the audience in order to profile the user experience as whats is expected from them and thus shape the design.
Disclaimer: please excuse that i use the "we" becouse i set my self as part of review process, please account that is not my intention to portrait my self as part of the oficial Kleros team wich im not currently a member.
In this review process the following arises to my mind.
Purpose and Audience:
Whoˋs the target audience? In the means of... Is it a "demo" for a client or a tool for end-users?
If its meant to be a demo for a client, do we align with thier design style?
if it is a end-user, is the style towards thier preferences?
Current observations:
Color Scheme:
Current colors used:
Current colors seems more suited for night use, contrast could improve.
Suggested colors:
If a primary color is already defined by its Purpose and Audience
Are we also considering upcoming trends and and harmonic palettes, ie: Pantone 2025?
User Expectations:
Hyperlinks and Navigation:
-Compared to other tools like https://curate.kleros.io where while at the "Module Details" where "Module History" inconsistency with hyperlinks expectations might arise.
ie: at the [following example] (https://curate.kleros.io/tcr/100/0xAe6aaed5434244be3699c56E7Ebc828194F26dc3/0x45aade17c75e7586590d8bc35f6ee6387d7e9cd28b8fe5b2463865575b01062e)
the "Submitted - Wed, 14 Aug 2024 08:31:15 GMT" is a link to the operation and 0xf313...c2f6 to the "user""
Entries are invalid
There seems to be entries in the data generated by this module that do not meet the criteria of the original Address Tag registry. Prompting jurors to verify this and reject accordingly.
Submitted - Wed, 14 Aug 2024 08:31:15 GMT by 0xf313...c2f6
. Accessibility:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: