You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 14, 2024. It is now read-only.
I understand that attribute names are case insensitive, but with other LDAP systems you can put in mixed case and get out mixed case. With ldapjs, the attribute name is converted to lower case and the original is lost. For example, in a modify request: modify_request.js#L65. The resulting Change object won't have the (potentially) mixed case attribute name.
I'm working on an ldapjs backend and want to store the attribute names in my database in mixed case (e.g. objectClass not objectclass). This will allow me to return more readable results for ldap searches without needing any sort of map from the lower case version of the attribute names to the mixed case version.
Would you accept a patch to add an originalType property to objects that force the type property to be lower case? If so, I can work on such a patch.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I understand that attribute names are case insensitive, but with other LDAP systems you can put in mixed case and get out mixed case. With ldapjs, the attribute name is converted to lower case and the original is lost. For example, in a modify request: modify_request.js#L65. The resulting Change object won't have the (potentially) mixed case attribute name.
I'm working on an ldapjs backend and want to store the attribute names in my database in mixed case (e.g.
objectClass
notobjectclass
). This will allow me to return more readable results for ldap searches without needing any sort of map from the lower case version of the attribute names to the mixed case version.Would you accept a patch to add an
originalType
property to objects that force thetype
property to be lower case? If so, I can work on such a patch.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: