Support for ARM64 in Dockerfile

[kkazakov]

Please, add more architectures, not only amd64.

[lllllllillllllillll]

I'm looking into it.

[lllllllillllllillll]

@kkazakov

I've updated v0.06-dev to be multi-platform, but it's untested:

services:
  dweebui:
    container_name: DweebUI
    image: lllllllillllllillll/dweebui:v0.06-dev
    restart: unless-stopped
    ports:
      - 8000:8000
    depends_on:
      - cache
    links:
      - cache
    volumes:
      - dweebui:/app
      - caddy:/app/caddyfiles
      - /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock
  cache:
    container_name: DweebCache
    image: redis:6.2-alpine
    restart: always
    command: redis-server --save 20 1 --loglevel warning --requirepass eYVX7EwVmmxKPCDmwMtyKVge8oLd2t81
    volumes: 
      - cache:/data
  proxy:
    container_name: DweebProxy
    image: caddy:2.4.5-alpine
    depends_on:
      - dweebui
    restart: unless-stopped
    network_mode: host
    volumes:
      - caddy:/data
      - caddy:/config
      - caddy:/etc/caddy
volumes:
  dweebui:
  cache:
  caddy:

[lllllllillllllillll]

Updated v0.06-dev:

amd64
arm64 (v8)
arm64/v7
arm64/v6

[gaby]

@lllllllillllllillll I'm going to make a PR to add support for building multi-platform images using Github Actions.

[lllllllillllllillll]

@kkazakov

Pasting your last comment in here and re-opening issue.

"I'm getting multitude of errors and the container keeps restarting:"

_Error: Cannot find module 'express'
Require stack:

• /app/app.js
  at Module._resolveFilename (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1082:15)
  at Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:928:27)
  at Module.require (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1149:19)
  at require (node:internal/modules/helpers:121:18)
  at Object. (/app/app.js:1:17)
  at Module._compile (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1267:14)
  at Module._extensions..js (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1321:10)
  at Module.load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1125:32)
  at Module.load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:965:12)
  at Function.executeUserEntryPoint [as runMain] (node:internal/modules/run_main:83:12) {
  code: 'MODULE_NOT_FOUND',
  requireStack: [ '/app/app.js' ]
  }

[lllllllillllllillll]

@kkazakov

I've updated the v0.06-dev image again.

Could you tell me what you get when you run this command on your Orange Pi
docker info --format '{{ .OSType }}/{{ .Architecture }}'

[kkazakov]

It's actually on Raspberry PI 2 the latest issue.

docker info --format '{{ .OSType }}/{{ .Architecture }}' returns

linux/armv7l

and currently it's producing

wasp@DietPi:~/docker-scripts/dweebui$ docker-compose up --remove-orphans --force-recreate -d
[+] Running 0/2
⠹ dweebui Pulling 3.1s
⠹ cache Pulling 3.1s
no matching manifest for linux/arm/v7 in the manifest list entries

[steveiliop56]

I don't think you should add armv7 support. It's no longer used.

[lllllllillllllillll]

It seems like there are up-to-date node images that support arm64, amd64, armv6, and armv7:

I think the node image supports armv7, but that one of the modules I'm using does not.

[steveiliop56]

There is no point in doing this. Everyone running docker on pis is using 64bit os. I would recommend only supporting arm64 and x86

[lllllllillllllillll]

Not specifically for the Raspberry Pis, but for broader device support in general.
It's not something I'm going to put a lot of energy into at the moment, but I think I'll eventually need to support more architectures if I want to be able to offer it as an alternative to Portainer.
I'd really like to get this running on my 1st gen Raspberry Pi as well.

[steveiliop56]

Alright alright no problem.