Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question: Contributing to MTF #65

Open
unijohn opened this issue May 22, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Question: Contributing to MTF #65

unijohn opened this issue May 22, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@unijohn
Copy link
Contributor

unijohn commented May 22, 2018

What would you like to contribute? Drop us an email or join our discussion list. We are an open organization and would love to hear your feedback on what we are doing right, and what we could do better.

Should we remove discussion list and add link to Slack? Can we provide a list of suggestions for possible ways to contribute? Do we even have a formalized list of such ways?

( In light of recent discussions, it seems to be a good time to revisit this particular question? )

@svpernova09
Copy link
Member

Should we remove discussion list and add link to Slack?

Sure

Can we provide a list of suggestions for possible ways to contribute? Do we even have a formalized list of such ways?

No formalized list, and I'm not even sure what all the possible contribution methods may be so open to having that discussion (here or in slack)

@dpritchett
Copy link
Member

I recommend we create some new placeholder repos with basic READMEs for the following purposes:

  • Suggestion box (submit github issues if you want to talk about something - cc @unijohn )
  • Onramp (curated Q&A on how to better help memtech (cc @hschreck)

@unijohn
Copy link
Contributor Author

unijohn commented Jun 24, 2018

Repinging @dpritchett to see about getting traction on this issue. If I need to create a new issue or just constantly post to mtf-contrib for people to read and review this issue, I can.

@svpernova09
Copy link
Member

IMHO onramp would be great, and should be included on the website.

@unijohn
Copy link
Contributor Author

unijohn commented Jun 26, 2018

Possible Food for Thought:
Summary of the book: Traction

While we aren't a startup in at all, I can see some overlap between the kinds of things we have discussed over the past days and weeks vs. what is suggested and outlined in this summary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants