-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 474
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Features and Ideas #21
Comments
Hey @dcarbone - thanks for your feedback! Glad you liked it enough to fork and build on it. I did read your post but I need to go through it again in more detail when I have a chance; I do have a few questions on some of those points. Other projects are consuming my time right now, so it might be a while. |
Signed-off-by: Prasad Ghangal <[email protected]>
If we convert int, in particular int64, to float we will loose precision. This should also cause problems in golang when trying to unmarshall jsons with these kind of numbers. I think the current detection as well as the new detection of #137 is better. |
The purpose of that conversion is due to the fact that sample input may only contain int-like values, when in fact the value could just be a float with zero precision when serialized. Precision loss is irrelevant if it fails to unmarshal in the first place :) |
Hey there,
First I want to thank you for creating this generator, was a big help.
Secondly, I have created my own implementation of this in php here: dcarbone/json-to-go
I added a few features I needed for various projects, namely:
goType
: Returns string representation of the go type (struct, slice, interface, etc.). By default my parser, like yours, does not do any sort of "map" or "json.RawMessage" determination as it is impossible to accurately do this automatically. Instead I let the user overload the "type" determination. "map" will lead to a specific type (MapType) while "json.RawMessage" and others will attempt to be created as SimpleType'd items. I might flesh this out if need be.mostSpecificPossibleGoType
: I only check for float / int determination, but I'm sure others have more advanced needs.formatPropertyName
: I follow your property name formatting system very closely, but I figure let others implement their own formatter if they needtoProperCase
: Again, I follow your implementation on this but others might want to muck with it.My use cases for the above generally revolve around mapping request and response types for large api's (hundreds of separate endpoints, which can lead to over a thousand separate models), and wanting to generate them on the fly.
I am not sure how many of these features would be helpful to the world at large, but I wanted to see if any would be of interest to you, and possibly provide ideas for future development.
If one stands out, let me know and I can work on a PR for your JS version.
Thanks again!
- Daniel
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: