You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have an on-premises component that uploads DICOM instance to the Azure (and would like to use the DICOM service instead).
In this scenario, we need that component to have the minimum rights possible (certainly not the ability to query, retrieve, or delete any instances, for example). Any of these rights increases the risk that an on-premises breach of escape of the application secret will lead to exfiltration of the customer's data with fully-laden PHI. One the data is in Azure, all our other applications that need to access it are also in Azure and can use RBAC, subnets, etc.
Presumably, the best way to achieve this would be with a 'Writer" role in the RBAC options.
User story
As a user in a lower-security environment, I want my application to only be able to store instances.
Acceptance criteria
Application can use STORE route
Application cannot query
Application cannot delete
Application cannot retrieve
Application cannot observe changed feed
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We have an on-premises component that uploads DICOM instance to the Azure (and would like to use the DICOM service instead).
In this scenario, we need that component to have the minimum rights possible (certainly not the ability to query, retrieve, or delete any instances, for example). Any of these rights increases the risk that an on-premises breach of escape of the application secret will lead to exfiltration of the customer's data with fully-laden PHI. One the data is in Azure, all our other applications that need to access it are also in Azure and can use RBAC, subnets, etc.
Presumably, the best way to achieve this would be with a 'Writer" role in the RBAC options.
User story
As a user in a lower-security environment, I want my application to only be able to store instances.
Acceptance criteria
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: