You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Analyzing the log for #3503 is not particularly useful, because we have too much noise coming from bots.
As a first step, I think it would be enough to record an action when the user clicks "apply search options" in the dropdown, recording as metadata: locale, project, search_* parameters set to true.
This would give us a sense of which options are used, and how frequently.
Measuring how frequently the menu is used compared to the standard search doesn't seem useful, since the options persist once set.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Measuring how frequently the menu is used compared to the standard search doesn't seem useful, since the options persist once set.
Rethinking about this: maybe it makes sense to track how many searches are performed through the search field, and store as metadata the advanced search options, on top of the main filters (string statuses, extra filters). That would give us a better picture, but it would also be a lot more data.
As for the last point, maybe we need a retention policy for the UXActionLog (e.g. 2 years?).
Analyzing the log for #3503 is not particularly useful, because we have too much noise coming from bots.
As a first step, I think it would be enough to record an action when the user clicks "apply search options" in the dropdown, recording as metadata: locale, project,
search_*
parameters set to true.This would give us a sense of which options are used, and how frequently.
Measuring how frequently the menu is used compared to the standard search doesn't seem useful, since the options persist once set.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: