Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Draft Name Change] OAuth vs SPICE Status Assertions #74

Open
peppelinux opened this issue Jun 12, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[Draft Name Change] OAuth vs SPICE Status Assertions #74

peppelinux opened this issue Jun 12, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@peppelinux
Copy link
Owner

peppelinux commented Jun 12, 2024

The current title of this draft is "OAuth Status Assertions".

The content of the draft is not specific to OAuth specifically. However, Status Assertions are specific to the use of Digital Credentials.

If a SPICE WG is created by the IESG (which should be known at the end of this week), the title of this document would become:

"SPICE Status Assertions". 

More seriously, its title should rather be "Credential Status Assertions" or "Digital Credential Status Assertions".

thanks to Denis.

@peppelinux peppelinux changed the title OAuth vs SPICE Status Assertions [Draft Name Change] OAuth vs SPICE Status Assertions Jul 2, 2024
@peppelinux
Copy link
Owner Author

aligning the name with Status List this draft should be therefore renamed to "Token Status Assertions"

@OR13
Copy link
Collaborator

OR13 commented Sep 26, 2024

or even shorter, Status Assertions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants